2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A topology optimization method for a coupled thermal–fluid problem using level set boundary expressions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yaji et al [103] utilized the level-set method to obtain the optimal design for a fully coupled thermo-fluidics problem. Tikhonov-based regularization scheme enabled the qualitative control for the geometric complexity of the generated structures.…”
Section: -2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yaji et al [103] utilized the level-set method to obtain the optimal design for a fully coupled thermo-fluidics problem. Tikhonov-based regularization scheme enabled the qualitative control for the geometric complexity of the generated structures.…”
Section: -2015mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For flow field design problems, Borrvall and Petersson [26] proposed a topology optimization method to minimize power dissipation in Stokes flow, and this has been expanded to laminar Navier-Stokes flow problems [27][28][29] and turbulence prob- lems [30,31]. The fluid topology optimization has been applied to multiphysics problems such as fluid-structure interaction problems [32,33], forced convection problems [34][35][36], natural convection problems [37][38][39] and turbulent heat transfer problems [40,41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Morimoto et al (2010) presented a smoothed shape correction operation to avoid numerical unstable phenomenon of boundary shape in shape updating for shape design of heat exchanger. On the other hand, a study on the topology shape optimization of heat convection fields was shown in a review paper of Dbouk (2017), and topology shape optimization analyses using the adjoint variable method have recently been conducted on heat convection fields by Yaji et al (2015), Kametani and Hasegawa (2017a), and Alexandersen et al (2014). Yaji et al (2015) and Kametani and Hasegawa (2017a) optimized the topology of forced convection fields, while Alexandersen et al (2014) used the adjoint variable method to optimize the topology of natural convection fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a study on the topology shape optimization of heat convection fields was shown in a review paper of Dbouk (2017), and topology shape optimization analyses using the adjoint variable method have recently been conducted on heat convection fields by Yaji et al (2015), Kametani and Hasegawa (2017a), and Alexandersen et al (2014). Yaji et al (2015) and Kametani and Hasegawa (2017a) optimized the topology of forced convection fields, while Alexandersen et al (2014) used the adjoint variable method to optimize the topology of natural convection fields. In these cases, the analysis was limited to steady-state problems, but an analysis of unsteady-state problems has been performed recently (Coffin and Maute, 2016;Kametani and Hasegawa, 2017b) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%