2021
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/p8w6b
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trait-based network perspective on the validation of the French Short Boredom Proneness Scale

Abstract: To explore the interplay between boredom, curiosity, and exploration, we computed a network analysis—a promising method from the emerging field of network psychometrics. This analysis (n = 490) revealed the structure of the relationships between the Short Boredom Proneness Scale (SBPS) and the two facets of the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II (CEI-II). Using a standard confirmatory factor analysis, we then report on the structural validation of the French SBPS, which provided support for the original co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Open Data: We confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported results, including codebook. The data and code for the main analyses are available at https://osf.io/thaum/ (Martarelli et al, 2022). Open Materials: We confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported methodology.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Open Data: We confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported results, including codebook. The data and code for the main analyses are available at https://osf.io/thaum/ (Martarelli et al, 2022). Open Materials: We confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported methodology.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Open Materials: We confirm that there is sufficient information for an independent researcher to reproduce all of the reported methodology. The questionnaire is available at https://osf.io/ thaum/ (Martarelli et al, 2022)…”
Section: Conflict Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%