2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Trans-dominant Negative 37 kDa/67 kDa Laminin Receptor Mutant Impairs PrPSc Propagation in Scrapie-infected Neuronal Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 Secretion of a transdominant negative LRP mutant also abolishes PrP Secretion of a transdominant negative LRP mutant also abolishes PrP Sc propagtion in neuronal cells. 24 � polyclonal anti-LRP/LR antibody termed W3 interferes with PrP27-30 cell binding 21 and internalization of bovine PrP Sc by human enterocytes. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Secretion of a transdominant negative LRP mutant also abolishes PrP Secretion of a transdominant negative LRP mutant also abolishes PrP Sc propagtion in neuronal cells. 24 � polyclonal anti-LRP/LR antibody termed W3 interferes with PrP27-30 cell binding 21 and internalization of bovine PrP Sc by human enterocytes. .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LRP/LR attracts more and more attention as a target for therapy in prion diseases and cancer. Multiple strategies on LRP inactivation have been shown to be successful by inhibiting PrP Sc propagation in vitro: (i) downregulation of LRP via antisense or siRNA strategies completely blocks PrP Sc propagation (Leucht et al, 2003) and delays the incubation time in scrapie-infected mice (H. Ludewigs and others, unpublished data), (ii) a trans dominant-negative LRP mutant interferes with PrP Sc propagation in ScN2a cells (Vana & Weiss, 2006) Sc propagation significantly by 66 % and prolongs the survival in scrapie-infected mice by 1.8-fold (Zuber et al, 2007b). Many of these anti-LRP/LR tools particularly antibodies, siRNAs and polysulfated glycanes interfere with the laminin-LRP/LR interaction, which results in a reduced invasive potential of neoplastic cells, recommending these tools as powerful therapeutic agents in the treatment of cancer, especially metastasis formation (Zuber et al, 2008b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LRP/LR attracts more and more attention as a target for therapy in prion diseases and cancer. Multiple strategies on LRP inactivation have been shown to be successful by inhibiting PrP Sc propagation in vitro: (i) downregulation of LRP via antisense or siRNA strategies completely blocks PrP Sc propagation (Leucht et al, 2003) and delays the incubation time in scrapie-infected mice (H. Ludewigs and others, unpublished data), (ii) a trans dominant-negative LRP mutant interferes with PrP Sc propagation in ScN2a cells (Vana & Weiss, 2006), (iii) polysulfated glycanes block the PrP Sc -LRP/LR interaction and strongly reduce PrP Sc binding (Gauczynski et al, 2006) and (iv) the anti-LRP antibody, W3, abrogates PrP Sc accumulation in scrapieinfected cells (Leucht et al, 2003) and prevents binding and internalization of PrP BSE prions (Morel et al, 2005). W3 reduces peripheral PrP Sc propagation significantly by 66 % and prolongs the survival in scrapie-infected mice by 1.8-fold (Zuber et al, 2007b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been shown that a LRP mutant encompassing only the extracellular domain of LRP/LR (LRP102-295::FLAG) might act in a transdominant negative manner as a decoy by trapping PrP molecules (Vana and Weiss, 2006). In vitro studies revealed that the LRP mutant is able to reduce the PrP Sc accumulation in scrapie-infected neuronal cells (Vana and Weiss, 2006) and, thus, might have potential for the development of a TSE therapy.…”
Section: Transdominant Negative Lrp Mutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%