2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0951-8339(01)00007-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A trial application of FSA methodology to the hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang (2002) also introduced a proactive, risk-based ''goal setting'' regime using FSA methodology for marine and offshore industries to increase the level of safety. Lee et al (2001) basically dealt with an application of FSA methodology according to the IMO's Interim Guidelines to the hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers, which was carried out as a cooperative research between Korean Register of Shipping and Seoul National University. As results of the study, 18 hazards were identified and 32 risk control measures were devised to reduce the associated risks.…”
Section: Formal Safety Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang (2002) also introduced a proactive, risk-based ''goal setting'' regime using FSA methodology for marine and offshore industries to increase the level of safety. Lee et al (2001) basically dealt with an application of FSA methodology according to the IMO's Interim Guidelines to the hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers, which was carried out as a cooperative research between Korean Register of Shipping and Seoul National University. As results of the study, 18 hazards were identified and 32 risk control measures were devised to reduce the associated risks.…”
Section: Formal Safety Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FSA is a generic framework that is not intended for immediate application in all circumstances (IMO 2002). In recent years, efforts have been made to adapt, further develop, or simply to apply or test the FSA in the maritime related systems or issues concerning risks associated with, for example, cruise ships (Lois et al 2003), bulk carrier (IMO 2004b) and hatchway watertight integrity of bulk carriers (Lee et al 2001), oil spills (Ventikos and Psaraftis 2004), fishing vessels (Loughran et al 2002), offshore industry (Wang 2002), container ships (Wang and Foinikis 2001), ports (Trbojevic and Carr 2000) and ships in general (Wang 1999), but not with risks of the maritime transport of packaged dangerous goods (PDG). The FSA is not readily applicable for risk analysis in the maritime transport of PDG.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na Tabela 4.6 são observadas as diferenças existentes entre o método proposto neste tese com as outras propostas, bem como as contribuições da proposta na análise de risco probabilístico. Para estimar a probabilidade dos eventos de perigo é usada a informação, sobre a taxa média de falha, disponível em bases de dados (NPRD, 1995;LEE, 1996;SMITH, 2000;OREDA, 2002) e publicações com estatísticas de falha para os diversos sistemas de navios aliviadores (GRAY e MACDONALD, 1982;GILBERT, WARD e WOLFORD, 2001;CHEN e MOAN, 2004;TSB, 2011…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…Os gráficos apresentados a seguir permitem observar o quanto os valores da pontuação afetam o comportamento da decisão, para cada um dos três cenários de falha (sem falha, falha DP e falha DP e MCP) e para cada uma das duas condições ambientais e as duas condições de calado. (NPRD, 1995;LEE, 1996;SMITH, 2000;OREDA, 2002).…”
Section: Validação Do Algoritmo Recorrenteunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation