1977
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.32.3.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tripartite model of mental health and therapeutic outcomes: With special reference to negative effects in psychotherapy.

Abstract: A tripartite conceptual model for the evaluation of mental health and psychotherapy outcomes is presented. The model highlights the values brought to bear by three "interested parties" in these evaluations: society, the individual, and the mental health professional. The model is elaborated in terms of the specific problem of negative ejects in psychotherapy, an issue of increasing concern to the public and the mental health profession. Clinical, research, and public policy implications of the model are discus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
140
0
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
140
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by Strupp and Hadley (1977), the professional, the client and the society have different perspectives on treatment outcome. This study obviously emanates from the therapist perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As pointed out by Strupp and Hadley (1977), the professional, the client and the society have different perspectives on treatment outcome. This study obviously emanates from the therapist perspective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This history shows that considerations of harm are not as self-evident as they might seem; they are multidimensional, historically contingent in relation to changing clinical and societal contexts, and open to interpretation by multiple parties with fluctuating levels of power (see also Strupp & Hadley, 1977, regarding conflicts in appraisals of harm from clinicians, clients, and society). Awareness of the roles of these contexts, interpretations, and power dynamics is helpful in appreciating differing conceptions of harmful treatment between the PHT and MCP discourses.…”
Section: The Concept Of “Harm” In the Pht And Mcp Discoursesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 illustrates the possibilities for each type of decision. Strupp and Hadley (1977) provided useful distinctions among the different perspectives from which client functioning might be judged when assessing the impacts of therapy: that of the client, the therapist, and the larger society. Each perspective offers a distinctive vantage point and so, perhaps understand ably, is only moderately correlated with each of the others (e.g., Tryon, Blackwell, & Hammel, 2007).…”
Section: Choices In How To Assess Supervision Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%