2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-machine flowshop problem with two agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al [12] study a two-machine flow shop problem with two agents where the objective is to minimize the total completion time of first agent with no tardy jobs for the second agent. Lee et al [13] consider two-agent two-machine flow shop scheduling problem and develop a BB algorithm and simulated annealing (SA) to minimize the total tardiness of the first agent with no tardy jobs for the second agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [12] study a two-machine flow shop problem with two agents where the objective is to minimize the total completion time of first agent with no tardy jobs for the second agent. Lee et al [13] consider two-agent two-machine flow shop scheduling problem and develop a BB algorithm and simulated annealing (SA) to minimize the total tardiness of the first agent with no tardy jobs for the second agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2009) focused on minimizing the total weighted completion time and introduced fully polynomialtime approximation schemes and an efficient approximation algorithm with a reasonable worst-case bound. Considering the two-machine flowshop setting with two agents, Lee et al (2010Lee et al ( , 2011 proposed a branch-and-bound algorithm and a simulated annealing heuristic to search for the optimal solution and near-optimal solutions, respectively. Leung et al (2010) generalized the single-machine problems proposed by Agnetis et al (2004) by including total tardiness in the objective function and considering jobs with different release dates and preemptions in a scheduling environment with parallel identical machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the effectiveness of the provided procedures for solving the problem, the number of instances was considered based on the study of Lee et al (2010), Lee et al (2011) and Yin et al (2012ab). For all instances, the processing times of the first agent's jobs and second agent's jobs were randomly generated from a uniform distribution on the interval [1,10].…”
Section: Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a branch and bound algorithm and a simulated annealing algorithm and claimed that the branch and bound algorithm can solve problems involving up to 15 jobs in size in a reasonable amount of time. Lee et al (2011) considered a two-agent scheduling problem in the two-machine flowshop, where the objective was to minimize the total completion time of the first agent's jobs with the restriction that the number of tardy jobs of the second agent is zero. They presented a branch and bound and a simulated annealing procedure to solve the problem, and showed that the branch and bound algorithm is capable of solving instances containing up to 20 jobs in size in a reasonable amount of time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%