2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
65
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach extends the fuzzy TOPSIS method to a hierarchical one and has been conducted by many researchers, also named as hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method [31][32][33]. This method inherits the hierarchy mechanism of AHP method and provides greater superiority to classical fuzzy TOPSIS methods [34,35]. The hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS does not have the disadvantages of the pairwise comparisons among criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives, while it also simultaneously overcomes the disadvantages for the necessity to assign an initial weight in fuzzy TOPSIS [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach extends the fuzzy TOPSIS method to a hierarchical one and has been conducted by many researchers, also named as hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS method [31][32][33]. This method inherits the hierarchy mechanism of AHP method and provides greater superiority to classical fuzzy TOPSIS methods [34,35]. The hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS does not have the disadvantages of the pairwise comparisons among criteria, sub-criteria and alternatives, while it also simultaneously overcomes the disadvantages for the necessity to assign an initial weight in fuzzy TOPSIS [31].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimise the risk of failure of a newly launched product, the best attribute design, among many alternatives, that satisfies various consumers' preferences should be found during the product development process. Conjoint analysis [14,15] and fuzzy multi-attribute decision techniques [16][17][18] have been introduced to describe consumers' preferences. Optimisation techniques, such as genetic algorithms [15], Lagrangian relaxation with a branch and bound algorithm [19], and particle swarm optimisation [20,21], which are all associated with preference measures, have been applied to determine the combination of product attributes that maximises a company's expected profit or the consumers' total utility.…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temporal, financial, and human) and result in the difficulties to meet the project goals, including product innovativeness. Unsatisfactory success rate of product development projects can also be considered from the perspective of inherent feature of NPD, that is, it is a relatively risky activity [5], as market competition and product technology advancement are often intense [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…temporal, financial, and human) and result in the difficulties to meet the project goals, including product innovativeness. Unsatisfactory success rate of product development projects can also be considered from the perspective of inherent feature of NPD, that is, it is a relatively risky activity [5], as market competition and product technology advancement are often intense [6].Although the success of a new product depends on the environmental uncertainties that are beyond a firm's control, companies should take into account both external and internal indices that can impact on the product success. Internal indices can be acquired from company's databases, including Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system, project management software, customer relationship management system, etc.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%