2017
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2017.1401243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage three-machine assembly scheduling problem with a position-based learning effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The normal job processing times on machines 1 , 2 , and 3 , in line with the scheme of Lee et al [5], were generated at random from a discrete uniform distribution (1, 100), respectively. All the parameters used in CSA adopted the settings of Wu et al [1] while all the parameters in IG used the results of previous tests. In the computational experiments for small number of jobs, was set at 8, 9, 10, and 11.…”
Section: Computational Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The normal job processing times on machines 1 , 2 , and 3 , in line with the scheme of Lee et al [5], were generated at random from a discrete uniform distribution (1, 100), respectively. All the parameters used in CSA adopted the settings of Wu et al [1] while all the parameters in IG used the results of previous tests. In the computational experiments for small number of jobs, was set at 8, 9, 10, and 11.…”
Section: Computational Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No matter what the number of jobs ( ) or the learning index ( ), all instances are solvable within 10 8 nodes. As for the impact of particular dominant properties on the efficiency of branch and bound (B&B), it can be easily done in the same way as that of Wu et al [1]. For the proposed algorithms, CSA and IGLS, the AEPs are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Computational Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the AFSP, Wu et al. (2018) and Kazemi et al. (2017) considered machining and assembly from the perspective of the flow‐shop scheduling problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, there are some two-stage models also with the learning effect consideration. Wu et al [13] adopted the learning model developed by Biskup [2] to solve a two-stage flow shop scheduling problem with three machines to minimize the makespan. ey devised three simulated annealing (SA) algorithms and three cloud theory-based SA algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%