A Unified Approach to Linking Experimental, Statistical and Computational Analysis of Spike Train Data

Abstract

A fundamental issue in neuroscience is how to identify the multiple biophysical mechanisms through which neurons generate observed patterns of spiking activity. In previous work, we proposed a method for linking observed patterns of spiking activity to specific biophysical mechanisms based on a state space modeling framework and a sequential Monte Carlo, or particle filter, estimation algorithm. We have shown, in simulation, that this approach is able to identify a space of simple biophysical models that were consistent with observed spiking data (and included the model that generated the data), but have yet to demonstrate the application of the method to identify realistic currents from real spike train data. Here, we apply the particle filter to spiking data recorded from rat layer V cortical neurons, and correctly identify the dynamics of an slow, intrinsic current. The underlying intrinsic current is successfully identified in four distinct neurons, even though the cells exhibit two distinct classes of spiking activity: regular spiking and bursting. This approach – linking statistical, computational, and experimental neuroscience – provides an effective technique to constrain detailed biophysical models to specific mechanisms consistent with observed spike train data.

Beyond the Connectome: The Dynome

“…To do so will also require the development and application of data analysis tools to characterize activity (R.E. Kass et al , 2014) including interacting rhythms across temporal and spatial scales (Tort et al , 2010), as well as principled approaches to link neuronal data with computational models (Huys & Paninski, 2009; Meng et al , 2014). …”

Inferring synaptic inputs from spikes with a conductance-based neural encoding model

“…Here we aim to narrow the gap between descriptive statistical and biophysically interpretable models, while remaining within the domain of models that can be estimated from extracellular spike train data (Meng et al, 2011(Meng et al, , 2014Lankarany, 2017). We first introduce a quasi-biophysical interpretation of the standard Poisson GLM, which reveals its equivalence to a constrained conductance-based model with equal and opposite excitatory and inhibitory tuning.…”

A point process approach to encode tactile afferents

“…1) Fitting models to data: In order to fit the neural data, we estimated the stimulus and history-dependent model parameters based on the maximum likelihood method [21]. Using 1 ms bins, the neural data was discretized.…”