2013
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2013.2262097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Unified Approach to Threat Assessment and Control for Automotive Active Safety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This signal is only used if the car is at risk of departing the lane and the torque on the steering column from the driver is sufficiently small (a threshold test that the authors use as a proxy for diminished capability due to inattention, tiredness, illness). In [15] a model predictive control system synthesizes both steering and braking signals for a nonlinear model of vehicle motion (which includes a simple but data driven model of driver behaviour). These signals are only nonzero if the driver model is unable to maintain the lane constraints, so they are added continuously to the driver's input but only affect that input when necessary.…”
Section: A Shared Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This signal is only used if the car is at risk of departing the lane and the torque on the steering column from the driver is sufficiently small (a threshold test that the authors use as a proxy for diminished capability due to inattention, tiredness, illness). In [15] a model predictive control system synthesizes both steering and braking signals for a nonlinear model of vehicle motion (which includes a simple but data driven model of driver behaviour). These signals are only nonzero if the driver model is unable to maintain the lane constraints, so they are added continuously to the driver's input but only affect that input when necessary.…”
Section: A Shared Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, driver assistance control problems for collision avoidance have been studied in several literatures. MPC based approaches for driver assistance control have been reported (Ercan et al 2016;Anderson et al 2010;Gray et al 2013;Erlien et al 2016). In these methods, the cost functions of the MPC algorithms are chosen so that the front wheel turn angle or the steering torque commanded by a human driver is corrected so as to prevent collisions only when the control action of the human driver is insufficient for collision avoidance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model predictive control (MPC) has for a long time been a well‐known and proven tool for motion planning and COLAV for, for example, ground and automotive robots (Gray, Ali, Gao, Hedrick, & Borrelli, ; Keller, Haß, Seewald, & Bertram, ; Ögren & Leonard, ), aerospace applications (Kuwata & How, ), and underwater vehicles (Caldwell, Dunlap, & Collins, ). In the later years, MPC has also been applied for COLAV in the maritime domain, both using sample‐based approaches where one considers a finite space of control inputs (Hagen, Kufoalor, Brekke, & Johansen, ; Johansen, Perez, & Cristofaro, ; Švec et al, ) and conventional gradient‐based search algorithms (Abdelaal & Hahn, ; Eriksen & Breivik, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%