2016
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.140376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified perspective on ankle push-off in human walking

Abstract: Muscle-tendon units about the ankle joint generate a burst of positive power during the step-to-step transition in human walking, termed ankle push-off, but there is no scientific consensus on its functional role. A central question embodied in the biomechanics literature is: does ankle push-off primarily contribute to leg swing, or to center of mass (COM) acceleration? This question has been debated in various forms for decades. However, it actually presents a false dichotomy, as these two possibilities are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pendular transduction analysis performed in this study could not shed any light on the relation between mechanical external work and metabolic energy expenditure (for a discussion of this issue, see [ 5 , 6 , 23 , 25 ]). However, external work does not represent the total work done, which also includes (among others) the internal work done to move limbs relative to the COM [ 16 , 23 , 53 55 ] and the work done by the trailing limb against the leading limb during double support [ 35 , 56 ]. Unfortunately, the method used here does not allow measuring individual limbs GRF .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pendular transduction analysis performed in this study could not shed any light on the relation between mechanical external work and metabolic energy expenditure (for a discussion of this issue, see [ 5 , 6 , 23 , 25 ]). However, external work does not represent the total work done, which also includes (among others) the internal work done to move limbs relative to the COM [ 16 , 23 , 53 55 ] and the work done by the trailing limb against the leading limb during double support [ 35 , 56 ]. Unfortunately, the method used here does not allow measuring individual limbs GRF .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this Review to interpret new data from experimental studies of great ape foot biomechanics, then apply these insights to the hominin fossil record to evaluate the selective forces that shaped human foot anatomy, and more broadly the evolution of bipedalism. Because we focus on the foot, we do not directly cover the ankle (talocrural and subtalar joints), but we refer readers to Pontzer et al (2014), O'Neill et al (2015 and Zelik and Adamczyk (2016) for overviews of comparative ankle biomechanics in humans and great apes. Additionally, we restrict our review to studies of terrestrial locomotion, but recommend Cartmill (1985), Richmond (2007), DeSilva (2009), Venkataraman et al (2013), Holowka et al (2017a) and Wunderlich and Ischinger (2017) for discussions of primate foot biomechanics and pedal grasping during arboreal locomotion.…”
Section: Windlass Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although COM power may be changed through various biomechanical mechanisms, it has been demonstrated that during the step-to-step transition, the ankle generates the largest power across all the lower extremity joints of the trailing limb in both healthy (Zelik and Adamczyk, 2016) and post-stroke populations. Motivated by this biomechanical understanding of COM power generation and its previously defined relationship to metabolic power demands during walking, this investigation focused on evaluating the effects of exosuit assistance of paretic ankle function on the COM power and individual joint power generated by the paretic and non-paretic trailing limbs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%