Due to its high energy-absorbing efficiency, [1,2] foam materials are widely used for protection in crush applications. Even though such applications vary in environmental and loading conditions, when it comes to helmet liners, static and dynamic loads are expected during the life cycle of the product. Such loads can be experienced during storage conditions, accidental or impact loads. Despite the stochastic profile of such loads, each foam material is expected to retain its functionality in all environmental conditions to which it will be exposed. For that reason, a range of standards is created to describe the expected performance of these materials when integrated into protective headgear. Out of all the available choices, expanded polystyrene (EPS) is the most preferable of all, for its thermal and moisture resistance, light weight, durability, availability, and cost. This creates a big range of safety applications where it is crucial to be able to accurately predict the behavior of EPS. As reported by Lorna, [3] foams, another term for a cellular solid, are made up of an interconnected network of solid shells which form the edges and faces of cells. These cells can be either closed-or opencelled and are spread as a 3D polyhedral in space. EPS is a rigid and tough, recyclable, closed-cell cellular material. It can undergo a large compressive deformation and absorb energy even at high strain rates. Under compressive loads, energy is dissipated through cell bending, buckling, or fracture. Its large energy-absorbing properties are the result of the plateau that is observed in the characteristic compressive stress strain curve of the material. [4-6] When closed-cell EPS foam is subjected to compressive loading, the entrapped air within the cells is compressed and additional viscous force is generated. Those forces increase with the loading rate, which results in the increase of strain rate sensitivity. [5] 1.1. Constitutive Material Models Foams are multi-phase materials. The gas-phase that is present in foams adds an additional degree of freedom which makes modeling of foams more difficult. There are several models available for various types of foams (rigid, flexible) and loading, but the models are usually limited, which makes the formulation of all the relevant behaviors of the foam difficult. The Maxwell model is a viscoelastic model. [7] It consists of a spring and a damper in series, where elastic response is represented by the spring and the time-dependent response by the damper. The constitutive equation for this model is described by Equation (1)