2014
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2014.2341173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Union Matching Method for SAR Images Based on SIFT and Edge Strength

Abstract: Multiplicative speckle noise often significantly affects the accuracy and adaptability of the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT) matching method for synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images. To address this problem, this study proposes a union matching method based on the SIFT and edge strength of the SAR image. First, the rotation constraint iteratively refines the initial SIFT match set based on the parameter decomposition of the common geometry transformation model. Using this model, square summation str… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two points are called a best point pair if they correspond to one another. The matched point and the best point pair are defined in Equation (4). An example is shown in Figure 4a, (4) where MP i→j is a matched point pair and indicates that the matched point of p i is q j ; MP j→i indicates that the matched point of q j is p i ; and BP i↔j is a best point pair.…”
Section: Shape Matching Using Shape Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two points are called a best point pair if they correspond to one another. The matched point and the best point pair are defined in Equation (4). An example is shown in Figure 4a, (4) where MP i→j is a matched point pair and indicates that the matched point of p i is q j ; MP j→i indicates that the matched point of q j is p i ; and BP i↔j is a best point pair.…”
Section: Shape Matching Using Shape Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-based methods have been proven to be effective, however, respective features are difficult to match and the robustness of the methods strongly depends on feature extraction results. To improve reliability and robustness, sophisticated approaches based on multi-features or multi-layer features have been developed [4,5]. Meanwhile, registration methods using both area-based and feature-based approaches have received more attention [3,6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain more accurate mapping at the subpixel scale, an improved method combining spatial dependence with directivity and connectivity of linear land covers is proposed, and simulated annealing arithmetic (SAA) is applied to optimize subpixel allocation. In [30], accuracy and adaptability of the SIFT matching method for SAR images are studied under strong multiplicative speckle noise, where SIFT point matching can be optimized based on the edge point feature in SAR images.…”
Section: F Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a registration algorithm combined an adaptive sampling method with SAR-SIFT and NCC has been proposed for GF-3 images [37]. Methods based on multi-features or multi-layer features [39,40] have been developed to improve the robustness of SAR image registration. Sui [41] proposed a registration method based on iterative line extraction…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%