Advances in X-Ray Analysis 1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2775-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Useful Guide for X-Ray Stress Evaluation (XSE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12] The elastic constants were taken from literature for the 422 planes. [13] A total of 18 measurements were made on each forging, some measurements being repeated to assess the experimental uncertainties. The average of these repeated measurements is reported.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] The elastic constants were taken from literature for the 422 planes. [13] A total of 18 measurements were made on each forging, some measurements being repeated to assess the experimental uncertainties. The average of these repeated measurements is reported.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'sin 2 ~b method' (Hauk, 1955;Macherauch & Miiller, 1961;D611e & Hauk, 1977;D611e, 1979;James & Cohen, 1980;Hauk, 1984;Hauk & Macherauch, 1984) is used to determine (residual) stresses from diffraction data. The measured diffraction line-shift strain often exhibits straight-line behaviour when plotted vs sin 2 ~p.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hauk recommends [29] for a good alignment of diffractometer in the complete range of c that the peak positions of the {hkl}-lines of the calibration powder should not differ by more than + 6 0.01°in 2q scale. However, in our laboratories an internal procedure is used which states for the determination of residual stress by X-ray diffraction that the peak displacement of a powder without stresses must not exceed 0.02°in the 2q scale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%