2019
DOI: 10.3390/geosciences9070289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation of ERA5 Reanalysis Data in the Southern Antarctic Peninsula—Ellsworth Land Region, and Its Implications for Ice Core Studies

Abstract: Climate reanalyses provide key information to calibrate proxy records in regions with scarce direct observations. The climate reanalysis used to perform a proxy calibration should accurately reproduce the local climate variability. Here we present a regional scale evaluation of meteorological parameters using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalyses compared to in-situ observations from 13 automatic weather stations (AWS), located in the southern Antarctic Peninsula and Ellsworth Land, Antarctica. Both reanalyses seem … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
117
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
117
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the ASCAT, the ERA5 and ERA-Interim show the similar spatial distributions and the spatial error patterns of annual mean wind over ocean, but ERA5 reduce the error in amplitude [33]. However, in Ellsworth Land Region, both ERA5 and ERA-Interim could reasonable reproduce the observation of mean wind speeds, and ERA-interim shows a smaller deviation than ERA5, especially in the coastal area [34]. In the Saskatchewan Prairies, the ERA5 and ERA-Interim have a negative wind speed bias in warm and cold season, and the ERA5 is slightly worse than ERA-Interim in warm season [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the ASCAT, the ERA5 and ERA-Interim show the similar spatial distributions and the spatial error patterns of annual mean wind over ocean, but ERA5 reduce the error in amplitude [33]. However, in Ellsworth Land Region, both ERA5 and ERA-Interim could reasonable reproduce the observation of mean wind speeds, and ERA-interim shows a smaller deviation than ERA5, especially in the coastal area [34]. In the Saskatchewan Prairies, the ERA5 and ERA-Interim have a negative wind speed bias in warm and cold season, and the ERA5 is slightly worse than ERA-Interim in warm season [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Here, we use ERA-Interim instead of ERA5, because ERA-Interim and ERA5 show similar ability to reproduce wind speed and sometimes ERA-Interim is better than ERA5 based on the previous studies [33][34][35]. Compared to the ERA-Interim, ERA5 show a little improvement in reproducing wind over land [34,35], and ERA-Interim show best performance in wind speed [36]. In addition, ERA-Interim have a good ability in reproducing the temperature and precipitation over mainland China [38], but its performance in reproducing the near-surface wind is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement could be associated with better representation of large-scale forcings (e.g., the ASL) as well as the finer local details of the topography and refined land−atmosphere physics. Very recently, some improvements in the performance of ERA5 over ERA-Interim in representing surface climate characteristics of the Antarctic continent were also reported (Tetzner et al, 2019;Gossart et al, 2019).…”
Section: Summary and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…ERA5 is highly accurate, representing the magnitude and variability of near-surface air temperature and wind regimes. The higher spatial and temporal resolution provided by ERA5 reduces significantly the cold coastal biases identified in ERA-Interim and increases the accuracy representing the wind direction and wind speed in the escarpment (Tetzner et al, 2019).…”
Section: Reanalysis Flux Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%