2009
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Validation Study of the Alcohol Dependence Scale

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Objective:The primary purpose of this study was to provide a comprehensive assessment of the underlying factor structure of the Alcohol Dependence Scale (ADS). Secondary goals included assessing concurrent validity of the total ADS and subscales derived from the factor analyses with variables related to alcohol dependence and further evaluating the validity of two proposed dichotomously scored, reduced-item ADS measures. Method: Responses to the ADS were obtained from participants who met Diagnostic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale contains 25 items assessing dyscontrolled drinking (α = .80), and exhibits good convergent validity with other indicators of AUD (Doyle & Donovan, 2009). This scale was used to test whether rumination is associated with symptoms of alcohol use disorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale contains 25 items assessing dyscontrolled drinking (α = .80), and exhibits good convergent validity with other indicators of AUD (Doyle & Donovan, 2009). This scale was used to test whether rumination is associated with symptoms of alcohol use disorder.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These were used for descriptive purposes. The ADS has demonstrated good reliability and validity (Allen et al, 1994; Doyle & Donovan, 2009, Drake, McHugo, & Biesanz, 1995). The ADS was used for sample description.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ADS is a reliable and valid measure of alcohol dependence (Doyle & Donovan, 2009). The alpha for the ADS in the current sample is .89.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%