1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Variational Level Set Approach to Multiphase Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
730
0
8

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 945 publications
(740 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
730
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…If V is the outward normal velocity of the interface, then we update the position of the interface implicitly via (7) where Ṽ is an extension of V off of the interface. The extension Ṽ is often obtained using a Hamilton-Jacobi PDE (e.g., see [55] and [2]). The fast marching method developed by Adalsteinsson and Sethian in [2] constructs an extension Ṽ while simultaneously reinitializing the level set function using an ordered sequence of discrete operations, but is only first-order accurate.…”
Section: Narrow Band/local Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If V is the outward normal velocity of the interface, then we update the position of the interface implicitly via (7) where Ṽ is an extension of V off of the interface. The extension Ṽ is often obtained using a Hamilton-Jacobi PDE (e.g., see [55] and [2]). The fast marching method developed by Adalsteinsson and Sethian in [2] constructs an extension Ṽ while simultaneously reinitializing the level set function using an ordered sequence of discrete operations, but is only first-order accurate.…”
Section: Narrow Band/local Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, it has been used for many different kind of physical problems, see [12][13][14]16]. The main idea behind this method is to represent the interface at each time t as the zero level set of a function ϕ.…”
Section: An Overview Of Level Set Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, C = {(x, y) ∈ Ω : φ(x, y) = 0}, and we choose φ to be positive inside C and negative outside C. For the level set formulation of our variational active contour model we essentially follow [20]. Therefore, we replace the unknown variable C by the unknown variable φ and the new energy, still denoted by F (φ, c 1 , c 2 ), becomes:…”
Section: The Level Set Formulation Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first possible regularization by C 2 and respectively C 1 functions, as proposed for instance in [20], is:…”
Section: Using the Heaviside Function H Defined Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation