2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A verification framework with application to a propulsion system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They thus propose a collaborative PHM development framework in which the PHM and aircraft design are completely integrated, as for instance has been done in the JSF project (Calvello, Olin, Hess, & Frith, 2007;Hess, Calvello, & Dabney, 2004). (Zhang et al, 2014;Nicolai & Dekker, 2008) show another challenge for prognostics in the verification and validation of the techniques used. It is important to acknowledge the degree to which a model and its associated data accurately represent the real-world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They thus propose a collaborative PHM development framework in which the PHM and aircraft design are completely integrated, as for instance has been done in the JSF project (Calvello, Olin, Hess, & Frith, 2007;Hess, Calvello, & Dabney, 2004). (Zhang et al, 2014;Nicolai & Dekker, 2008) show another challenge for prognostics in the verification and validation of the techniques used. It is important to acknowledge the degree to which a model and its associated data accurately represent the real-world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model checking approach has 2 main methods including KS and LTS. 66,[91][92][93] Some well-known model checkers are applied to verification approach such as NuSMV, § SPIN, ¶ PAT, # and UPPAAL**. 74,94 The existing model checking methods specify a state space exploration of the system behavior using reachable graph of binary decision diagrams.…”
Section: Model Checking Methods In the Service Composition Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the technical results, advantages, and disadvantages are compared in Section 4.2.2. The model checking approach has 2 main methods including KS and LTS . Some well‐known model checkers are applied to verification approach such as NuSMV, SPIN, PAT, and UPPAAL .…”
Section: Categorizing Of Selected Service Composition Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model checking is an influential formal verification method to evaluate software systems . Kripke structure (KS) and labeled transition system (LTS) are two main verification methods in the model checking.…”
Section: Motivation and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model checking is an influential formal verification method to evaluate software systems. 4,[26][27][28] Kripke structure (KS) and labeled transition system (LTS) are two main verification methods in the model checking. Also, NuSMV, Process Analysis Toolkit (PAT), UPPAAL, and TLA+ are famous model checking tools that evaluate the proposed behavioral models according to specified specification rules using temporal logic.…”
Section: Preliminaries and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%