A versatile argumentation system based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation

Tannai, Satoru; Gotō, Yoshiaki; Maruyama, Yoshihumi; Itoya, Takuto; Hagiwara, Toru; Sawamura, Hajime

doi:10.1109/his.2011.6122134

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Table 6 shows the included studies classified by the goal of the proposed approach. Some generic studies with a non-specific dialogue type, (Tannai et al 2011;Gaertner and Toni 2007;Wang and Luo 2010;Caiquan et al 2010;Hsairi et al 2006;Hsairi et al 2010;Obeid and Moubaiddin 2009;Xiong et al 2012;Gaertner and Toni 2008;Vreeswijk 2005;Amgoud et al 2000) are not in the table.…”

Section: Problem Typementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Based on the included studies in the review, the most commonly used technique is rulebased inference (Hsairi et al 2006;Gaertner and Toni 2007;Moraitis and Spanoudakis 2007;Yuan et al 2009;Obeid and Moubaiddin 2009;Caiquan et al 2010;Tannai et al 2011;Xiong et al 2012;Harvey et al 2007;Huang and Lin 2010;Janjua and Hussain 2012;Wardeh et al 2012;Rowe et al 2012;van der Weide et al 2011). However, there are other techniques that must not be ignored because they offer other alternatives to reason under uncertainty, such as fuzzy logic Hsairi et al 2010;Chow et al 2013;Wang and Luo 2010;Tao et al 2014;Bedi and Vashisth 2014) Vicari et al 2003), to reason based on similarity, such as CBR Aulinas et al 2012;), or to measure the benefit of a specific action using utility functions (Ge et al 2010).…”

Section: Agent Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research

Carrera

Iglesias

2015

Artif Intell Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ability to build arguments that express thoughts is crucial for intelligent interactions among human beings. Thus, argumentation techniques have been applied for years in fields, such as rhetoric or artificial intelligence. More specifically, the agents paradigm fits into the use of these types of techniques because agents shape a society in which they interact to make arrangements or to decide future actions. Those interactions can be modelled using argumentation techniques. Therefore, the application of those techniques in multi-agent systems is an interesting research field. However, no systematic review has been conducted previously, to the best of the authors' knowledge, to provide an overview of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems. This paper presents a systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research. The period of time that is included in this review is from 1998 to 2014. The objective of this review is to obtain an overview of the existing approaches and to study their impact on research and practice. The research method has been defined to identify relevant studies based on a predefined search strategy, and it is clearly defined to facilitate the reading of this paper. All of the included studies in this review have been analysed from two different points of view: the Application view and the Multi-Agent System view. A comprehensive analysis of the extracted data is provided in the paper, which is based on a set of research questions that are defined. The results of this review reveal suggestions for further research and practice. The argumentation technology is actually in a phase of internal enhancement and exploration. Moreover, the research interest in this topic has increased in the last years. Furthermore, several interesting findings are presented in the paper.

show abstract

Section: Problem Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Agent Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research

Carrera

Iglesias

2015

Artif Intell Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our former PIRIKA (Tannai et al, 2013) is a synchronous argumentation in the sense that every agent who wants to participate in argumentation prepare its own knowledge base once prior to argumentation. Then, it produces an outcome of argumentation and displays it, as in many argumentation systems developed so far (Rahwan and Simari, 2009).…”

Section: Asynchronous Argumentationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Asynchronous Argumentation with Pervasive Personal Communication Tools

Katsura

Sawamura

Hagiwara

et al. 2014

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we propose an argument-based communication tool for humans and agents, which supplements and alternates the current communication system such as Twitter, Line, etc. in order to allow us to make a more deliberate and logical human communication. For this purpose, we devised asynchronous argumentation based on our logic of multiple-valued argumentation. It may be as well reworded as asymptotic or incremental argumentation since agents could approach towards truth or justification every time argument is put forward by an agent. We have made real the asynchronous argumentation system, named PIRIKA (pilot of the right knowledge and argument), on the pervasive personal tool, iPad. Finally some lessons learned from the experimental uses of PIRIKA are reported.

show abstract

“…Dung's Argumentation Framework (DAF) (Dung, 1995) ( Tannai et al, 2011;Caiquan et al, 2010;Yuan et al, 2011;van der Weide et al, 2011;Amgoud and Serrurier, 2007;Huang and Lin, 2010;Xiong et al, 2012;Rowe et al, 2012;Vreeswijk, 2005;Wang et al, 2014;Bedi and Vashisth, 2014) Preference-based Argumentation …”

Section: Argumentation Framework Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Agent Technology for Fault Diagnosis of Telecommunication Networks

Carrera¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A versatile argumentation system based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation

Cited by 4 publications

References 7 publications

A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research

A systematic review of argumentation techniques for multi-agent systems research

Asynchronous Argumentation with Pervasive Personal Communication Tools

Application of Agent Technology for Fault Diagnosis of Telecommunication Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About