2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-013-9852-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A versatile fluorescence-based multiplexing assay for CAPS genotyping on capillary electrophoresis systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Markers, for which polymorphisms were based on presence or absence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments between parental lines, were directly mapped. In turn, SNPs were transformed to cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers (Perovic et al, 2013b) or pyrosequencing markers using a biotin‐labeled M13 primer (Silvar et al, 2011b). Linkage analyses were performed with JoinMap 4.0 (Van Ooijen, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Markers, for which polymorphisms were based on presence or absence of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fragments between parental lines, were directly mapped. In turn, SNPs were transformed to cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) markers (Perovic et al, 2013b) or pyrosequencing markers using a biotin‐labeled M13 primer (Silvar et al, 2011b). Linkage analyses were performed with JoinMap 4.0 (Van Ooijen, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various codominant marker platforms have been used effectively to map resistance genes in crop plants. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers or microsatellites are highly polymorphic and reproducible; however, they are not amenable for high throughput even in the case of modified capillary systems (Perovic et al 2013a ) nor as abundant as single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). Due to the property of abundance and high throughput, SNP markers have become the most amenable for gene mapping and breeding (Silvar et al 2011 ; Rasheed et al 2017 ; Lu et al 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these five DH-lines four crosses were conducted, namely DH3/74 (S) × DH3/6 (R), DH3/74 (S) × DH3/127 (R), DH3/6 (R) × DH3/9 (S) and DH3/62 (S) × DH3/127 (R) (Table 1). In order to identify recombinants, F 2 plants were analyzed using two flanking co-dominant SSRs, i.e., QBS94 (distal) and QBS113 (proximal) (Perovic et al, 2013). Respective markers were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis at the genetic analyzer ABI PRISM ® 3100 (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers used may be divided in five types as follows: six SSRs based markers from the pyrosequencing assay (Silvar et al, 2011), three dominant present/absent markers, four size polymorphism markers [insertion/deletion polymorphisms (InDels)], 19 KASP markers and 24 Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (CAPS) markers. Size polymorphisms markers and SSRs were amplified in a total volume of 10 μl, according to Perovic et al (2013) and detected either using fluorescently labeled primers (M13) by capillary electrophoresis on the ABI Genetic Analyzer (ABI sequencer, ABI Perkin Elmer, Weiterstadt, Germany), or directly separated on a 1.5% agarose gel. For ABI analysis, 0.1 μl of M13 primer (10.0 pmol/μl)(5′-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3′) labeled with fluorescent dye was added to the reaction mix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%