2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2017.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A virtual sensing based augmented particle filter for tool condition prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When partial observations are made and random perturbations are present in the data, methods such as Kalman filters and particle filters [ 5 ] can be relied on for the estimation of the internal states of dynamical systems. These methods compute the unknown quantities through posterior distributions obtained from Bayesian inference models [ 6 , 7 ]. Although particle filters are not subject to the constraints of non-Gaussianity of perturbations and linearity of the dynamic systems that affect Kalman ones, they have some disadvantages as well, related to possible resampling biases and to the coarseness of the definition of the likelihood distribution, which may be unable to capture all relevant real-world characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When partial observations are made and random perturbations are present in the data, methods such as Kalman filters and particle filters [ 5 ] can be relied on for the estimation of the internal states of dynamical systems. These methods compute the unknown quantities through posterior distributions obtained from Bayesian inference models [ 6 , 7 ]. Although particle filters are not subject to the constraints of non-Gaussianity of perturbations and linearity of the dynamic systems that affect Kalman ones, they have some disadvantages as well, related to possible resampling biases and to the coarseness of the definition of the likelihood distribution, which may be unable to capture all relevant real-world characteristics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical methods developed for estimating tool wear have relied upon either empirical models or the information collected from various types of sensors. Thus, these tool wear estimation methods can be divided into two broad categories, including physics-based and data-driven methods [11,12]. The empirical models developed in physics-based estimation methods seek to describe the physics of a machining system, and then determine the values of model parameters through extensive experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tool wear monitoring or estimating is usually divided into direct monitoring and indirect monitoring [6]. Direct sensing techniques of a tool wear by using microscope or charged-couple-device (CCD) camera is a traditional visionbased tool wear measurement method [7]. But this method has to stop machine and remove the tool from holder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%