2011
DOI: 10.3390/s110302773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Virtual Sensor for Online Fault Detection of Multitooth-Tools

Abstract: The installation of suitable sensors close to the tool tip on milling centres is not possible in industrial environments. It is therefore necessary to design virtual sensors for these machines to perform online fault detection in many industrial tasks. This paper presents a virtual sensor for online fault detection of multitooth tools based on a Bayesian classifier. The device that performs this task applies mathematical models that function in conjunction with physical sensors. Only two experimental variables… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bustillo et al [22] carried out a study using a virtual sensor for online fault detection of multi-tooth tools during milling operation of engine crankshafts based on a Bayesian model and used the electrical power consumption and the machining time as output variables. These authors reported that a 26 workpiece interval before the workpiece that is machined in real time is necessary for fault detection, against 40-70 workpiece interval observed in previous works, as well as a measured accuracy of 98 %.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bustillo et al [22] carried out a study using a virtual sensor for online fault detection of multi-tooth tools during milling operation of engine crankshafts based on a Bayesian model and used the electrical power consumption and the machining time as output variables. These authors reported that a 26 workpiece interval before the workpiece that is machined in real time is necessary for fault detection, against 40-70 workpiece interval observed in previous works, as well as a measured accuracy of 98 %.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To bridge the gap between direct sensing and indirect sensing, virtual sensing, as a complement to physical sensing, has emerged as a viable, noninvasive, and cost effective method to infer difficult-to-measure or expensive-to-measure parameters in dynamic systems based on computational models [22]. It has been investigated for active noise and vibration control [23], industrial process control [24], building operation optimization [25], lead-through robot programming [26], product quality of semiconductor industry [27], and tool condition monitoring [28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [28], an artificial neural network model is investigated to infer the state of insert wear from translational vibration measurements on a milling machine. Bayesian network is studied for tool breakage detection utilizing the in-process electrical power signal [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been investigated for active noise and vibration control (Petersen et al 2008), industrial process control (Cheng et al 2004), building operation optimization (Ploennigs et al 2011), lead-through robot programming (Ragaglia et al 2016), product quality of hydrodesulfurization (HDS) (Shokri et al 2015), and tool condition monitoring (Bustillo et al 2011;Li and Tzeng 2000). Data-driven virtual sensing techniques are favorable by fusing the extracted features from noisy online measurements to infer the difficult-tomeasure parameters based on artificial intelligence models (Gelman et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%