2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A weakly compressible free-surface flow solver for liquid–gas systems using the volume-of-fluid approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(7). However, considering uniform gas pressure inside the bubble is not pertinent to computing the interaction of a bubble with pressure waves (shock waves) when the Mach number is high [37,38]. It is worth noting that the first term cannot be neglected, as in the case of fast variations of the ambient pressure with high frequency and very short time scales resulting in the rapid volume and shape oscillations of gas bubbles in liquid.…”
Section: Gas Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(7). However, considering uniform gas pressure inside the bubble is not pertinent to computing the interaction of a bubble with pressure waves (shock waves) when the Mach number is high [37,38]. It is worth noting that the first term cannot be neglected, as in the case of fast variations of the ambient pressure with high frequency and very short time scales resulting in the rapid volume and shape oscillations of gas bubbles in liquid.…”
Section: Gas Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the handling of thermodynamic pressure is not straightforward and becomes complex to exactly estimate 043107-2 it near the interface with the two pressure model. Another kind of method based on the two-phase flow formulation of a weakly compressible volume of fluid (VOF) approach with pressure-projection method is developed by Heyns et al [37]. The method contains a single-fluid Eulerian finite volume approach of Navier-Stokes equations in low Mach number conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, for problems where compression of air is significant, it would be necessary to account for air compressibility while treating water as incompressible. Therefore, the incompressible 2P-CPM [14] is further improved by accounting for air compressibility in the present study such that water-air flows with air entrapment can be accurately simulated.To model incompressible or weakly compressible flows, the approach of artificial compressibility was used by other researchers [4,15], by replacing the transient density term in the continuity term with a pressure term through an EOS. Nevertheless, employing the real compressibility parameter by 1P-CPM and 2P-CPM are similar for the time period without an entrapped air pocket.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%