2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A WebGIS platform for managing the seismic risk at regional scale: the case study of the Emilia-Romagna Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proposed methodology, the hazard factor only refers to the national seismic classification, according to which the whole Municipality of Castelfranco Emilia presents a low-to-medium level of seismic hazard, calculated as values of expected shaking on rigid ground and horizontal topographic surfaces. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that the geological and geotechnical features of a site may influence the level of the seismic ground shaking that is experienced [63]. Therefore, integrating more in-depth studies on the seismic hazard factor would allow for a more detailed mapping of the risk conditions in the urban area and would allow for a strengthened and more integrated knowledge of possible damage conditions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed methodology, the hazard factor only refers to the national seismic classification, according to which the whole Municipality of Castelfranco Emilia presents a low-to-medium level of seismic hazard, calculated as values of expected shaking on rigid ground and horizontal topographic surfaces. Nevertheless, it is acknowledged that the geological and geotechnical features of a site may influence the level of the seismic ground shaking that is experienced [63]. Therefore, integrating more in-depth studies on the seismic hazard factor would allow for a more detailed mapping of the risk conditions in the urban area and would allow for a strengthened and more integrated knowledge of possible damage conditions.…”
Section: Conclusion and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%