2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2006.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Wiener-type neuronal model in the presence of exponential refractoriness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expressions for such probabilities have been obtained in [3] for the Wiener process for exponentially distributed refractory periods. In the general time homogeneous case…”
Section: Refractoriness and Return Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressions for such probabilities have been obtained in [3] for the Wiener process for exponentially distributed refractory periods. In the general time homogeneous case…”
Section: Refractoriness and Return Process Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, let us consider the diffusion Z with holding and jumping boundary c ≥ Z(0), associated to Z(t) = Z(0) + µt + B t with µ > 0, Z(0) > 0, and U ∈ (0, c). Z is similar to the Wiener-type neuronal model in the presence of refractoriness, considered in [8], [18], for which the neuron fires when its voltage exceeds the threshold c, and after the refractoriness period, the voltage is reset to U ∈ (0, c). We observe that the process Z can be reduced to our case; indeed, by using that −B t is distributed as B t , it follows that the distribution of the first hitting time of Z to c, when starting from Z(0) ≤ c, is nothing but the distribution of the first hitting time of X −µ to zero, when starting from c − Z(0) ≥ 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the correct identification of refractory period substantially influences a correct inference of firing rate (see Barbieri et al, 2001 andBrown et al, 2002). The problem has also been studied frequently in neuronal models, as discussed in Albano et al (2007), Buonocore et al (2002Buonocore et al ( , 2003, Ricciardi and Esposito (1966) and Teich et al (1978).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%