2020
DOI: 10.1177/1523422320946115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Workplace Dignity Perspective on Resilience: Moving Beyond Individualized Instrumentalization to Dignified Resilience

Abstract: The Problem Resilience discourses in society and the contemporary workplace tend to emphasize the self-directed nature of resilience and the imposed demand for resilience for survival in the contemporary labor market. The Solution In this article, the anchoring point of resilience is analyzed when conceptualized within a neoliberal and self-directed ideology. Subsequently, it offers an alternative anchoring point through a dignity-perspective on resilience, through which the term is reinterpreted in a new mean… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A closer look at the literature shows that AM is seen to limit human dignity through the dehumanisation and instrumentalisation of workers. Here, dehumanisation equates to the objectification of human beings and denial of their human attributes (Haslam, 2006), whereas instrumentalisation refers to the use of humans as 'merely means to an end' (Bal, 2017;Bal et al, 2020). For example, according to Moore and Robinson (2016), quantification at work compels workers "to squeeze every The feedback loop in this framework reflects that a worker's choices (box d) are, under AM, often directly influenced by nudging techniques etc.…”
Section: Dehumanisation and Instrumentalisation In The Am Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A closer look at the literature shows that AM is seen to limit human dignity through the dehumanisation and instrumentalisation of workers. Here, dehumanisation equates to the objectification of human beings and denial of their human attributes (Haslam, 2006), whereas instrumentalisation refers to the use of humans as 'merely means to an end' (Bal, 2017;Bal et al, 2020). For example, according to Moore and Robinson (2016), quantification at work compels workers "to squeeze every The feedback loop in this framework reflects that a worker's choices (box d) are, under AM, often directly influenced by nudging techniques etc.…”
Section: Dehumanisation and Instrumentalisation In The Am Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 In March 2020, Australia released the National Disaster Risk Reduction Framework, with a renewed focus on resilience in risk reduction and management. 8 Resilience is a complex phenomenon 18 which may skew benefit toward people who are already in privileged positions and have access to the resources needed to be resilient. 18 Resilience places the onus on people to improve their individual circumstances and when treated as a 'competence', continues to marginalise people with disability.…”
Section: Building Resilience Through Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Resilience is a complex phenomenon 18 which may skew benefit toward people who are already in privileged positions and have access to the resources needed to be resilient. 18 Resilience places the onus on people to improve their individual circumstances and when treated as a 'competence', continues to marginalise people with disability. 17 The inclusion of specific reference to people with disability in disaster risk reduction and the development of tools is important, but does little to address entrenched ableism.…”
Section: Building Resilience Through Dignitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, metaphors can influence perception and action concerning the framing and sense-making of one's career, but they also risk narrowing one's field of focus [13,14,[17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. This acknowledges concerns of an over-emphasis of the ability of an individual to demonstrate resilience and the need for organisational responsibility for the wellbeing of their employees [83]. Therefore, the WCM should be viewed as a tool within a toolbox that a career coach can use to facilitate a client to make sustainable and informed decisions about their career.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%