2008
DOI: 10.1038/nature06426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A young massive planet in a star–disk system

Abstract: There is a general consensus that planets form within disks of dust and gas around newly born stars. Details of their formation process, however, are still a matter of ongoing debate. The timescale of planet formation remains unclear, so the detection of planets around young stars with protoplanetary disks is potentially of great interest. Hitherto, no such planet has been found. Here we report the detection of a planet of mass (9.8+/-3.3)M(Jupiter) around TW Hydrae (TW Hya), a nearby young star with an age of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
138
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stellar RV variations are produced by different magneticactivity-related phenomena: convection (Saar 2009), starspots , magnetic plage/network (Saar 2003) and flares (Saar 2009;Reiners 2009). Although bisector analysis may sometimes lead to the confirmation of a planet orbiting a star even when RV jitter is present (Sozzetti et al 2006;Setiawan et al 2007Setiawan et al , 2008, the latter technique is not always successful (Huélamo et al 2008;Figueira et al 2010). Several authors have studied the impact of activity on RV jitter using R HK as a proxy (Saar et al 1998;Santos et al 2000;Paulson et al 2002;Saar et al 2003;Wright 2005;Paulson & Yelda 2006;Santos et al 2010).…”
Section: Predicted Radial Velocity Jittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stellar RV variations are produced by different magneticactivity-related phenomena: convection (Saar 2009), starspots , magnetic plage/network (Saar 2003) and flares (Saar 2009;Reiners 2009). Although bisector analysis may sometimes lead to the confirmation of a planet orbiting a star even when RV jitter is present (Sozzetti et al 2006;Setiawan et al 2007Setiawan et al , 2008, the latter technique is not always successful (Huélamo et al 2008;Figueira et al 2010). Several authors have studied the impact of activity on RV jitter using R HK as a proxy (Saar et al 1998;Santos et al 2000;Paulson et al 2002;Saar et al 2003;Wright 2005;Paulson & Yelda 2006;Santos et al 2010).…”
Section: Predicted Radial Velocity Jittermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detectability limit of an embedded giant planet by radial velocity measurements is ∼10 M J or ∼2 M J (M J is the mass of Jupiter) orbiting at 1 AU or 0.5 AU, respectively, due to heavy variability in the optical spectra of young (<10 Myr) stars (e.g., Paulson & Yelda 2006;Prato et al 2008). Note that although there were attempts to detect planets by radial velocity measurements in young systems, no firm detection has yet been repeated see, e.g., Setiawan et al (2008) for TW Hya b, debated later by Huélamo et al (2008). The discovery of planetary systems by direct imaging nowadays is restricted to large separations >10−100 AU (Veras et al 2009) and favors higher mass planets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of controversial cases have been reported in the literature (e.g. Setiawan et al 2008;Huélamo et al 2008;Hernán-Obispo et al 2010;Figueira et al 2010). Simultaneous monitoring of activity indicators, spectral line profile changes, and photometric variations may allow one to recognize the true origin of the radial velocity variations and to at least partially account for them (see e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%