1999
DOI: 10.1039/a902919b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A zwitterionic carbene–plumbylene adduct

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Pb−C distance of 2.4341(46) Å is significantly shorter than in a diarylplumbylene adduct with a somewhat bulkier NHC by Weidenbruch et al. (2.540 Å) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pb−C distance of 2.4341(46) Å is significantly shorter than in a diarylplumbylene adduct with a somewhat bulkier NHC by Weidenbruch et al. (2.540 Å) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high number of isotopes is consistent with lead's atomic number being even. [h] Lead has a magic number of protons (82), for which the nuclear shell model accurately predicts an especially stable nucleus. [31] Lead-208 has 126 neutrons, another magic number, which may explain why lead-208 is extraordinarily stable.…”
Section: Atomicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger 1 J (Pb,C) value in Ph 3 Pb − relative to Ph 4 Pb, would suggest (much) increased multiple‐bond character between Pb and C in Ph 3 Pb − , if 1 J (Si,C) for the silenes versus the sp 3 Si−C Me bonds follow the same relationship as 1 J (Pb,C) for Ph 3 Pb − versus Ph 4 Pb. However, this is unlikely due to the unfavorable contribution of the Pb−C double‐bond character . We felt that this must arise from the large difference in the relativistic effect on 1 J (Pb,C) between Ph 3 Pb − and Ph 4 Pb, since such a large difference was not reported for Ph 3 Sn − versus Ph 4 Sn (see Table ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%