2018
DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwy009.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A139 Agreement of Ibdoc® and Quanton Cal® Rapid Lateral Flow-Based Fecal Calprotectin Tests With Accepted Lab-Based Assays for Monitoring Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that no bias has been introduced due to the used (different) tests, since a good correlation between the QoC and other ELISA laboratory tests (Bühlmann Turbo) has been reported in the literature, as well as a similar accuracy for mucosal inflammation. 38 40 Thirdly, the sample size of our study is relatively small, and therefore subgroup analyses, including the separate analysis in UC and CD, might have been underpowered to detect differences. It is unlikely that the combined analysis of CD and UC has significantly influenced our results, since all patients with FC <250 µg/g at week 8 had endoscopic response at week 16; this value may serve as a cut-off to identify responders both in UC and in CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We assume that no bias has been introduced due to the used (different) tests, since a good correlation between the QoC and other ELISA laboratory tests (Bühlmann Turbo) has been reported in the literature, as well as a similar accuracy for mucosal inflammation. 38 40 Thirdly, the sample size of our study is relatively small, and therefore subgroup analyses, including the separate analysis in UC and CD, might have been underpowered to detect differences. It is unlikely that the combined analysis of CD and UC has significantly influenced our results, since all patients with FC <250 µg/g at week 8 had endoscopic response at week 16; this value may serve as a cut-off to identify responders both in UC and in CD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%