2017
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine through an International Consortium

Abstract: The AACR Project GENIE is an international data-sharing consortium focused on generating an evidence base for precision cancer medicine by integrating clinical-grade cancer genomic data with clinical outcome data for tens of thousands of cancer patients treated at multiple institutions worldwide. In conjunction with the first public data release from approximately 19,000 samples, we describe the goals, structure, and data standards of the consortium and report conclusions from high-level analysis of the initia… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

20
758
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,445 publications
(847 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
20
758
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31 Data from GENIE were obtained as previously described. 31 The 10 most common diagnoses that harbor MDM2 amplification from the current report were selected for the comparison. MDM2 amplifications were seen in 3.5% (3,650 of 102,878) of patients in the current report versus 5.5% (744 of 13,473) from GENIE.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Data from GENIE were obtained as previously described. 31 The 10 most common diagnoses that harbor MDM2 amplification from the current report were selected for the comparison. MDM2 amplifications were seen in 3.5% (3,650 of 102,878) of patients in the current report versus 5.5% (744 of 13,473) from GENIE.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1h and Supplementary Fig. 4e,f) 1,4 . Notably, despite a ~5-fold enrichment in the co-occurrence of these two alterations, this interaction would be statistically insignificant in a naive survey of all potential pairwise driver interactions after correcting for multiple-hypothesis testing, thus illustrating the need to study genetic interactions beyond co-occurrence patterns ( P = 0.32 after Bonferroni correction for 10 pairwise interactions) 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Cancer genome sequencing has catalogued many of these alterations; however, the combinatorial effects of these alterations on tumor growth is largely unknown 1,4 . Most putative drivers are altered in less than 10% of tumors 2 , suggesting that these alterations may be inert, weakly beneficial, or beneficial only in certain genomic contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is no gold standard knowledgebase for genomic data interpretation. Therefore, the efforts in quality control [30] and genotype-phenotype knowledgebase construction [31] should be followed.…”
Section: Genomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%