1993
DOI: 10.1021/ma00074a014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio characterizations of molecular structures, conformation energies, and hydrogen-bonding properties for polyurethane hard segments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally, the N-H· · · O=C hydrogen bond between two urea groups has been considered the strongest, with hydrogen bond between two urethane groups being the second strongest. However, recent studies have shown that N-H· · · O (ether) bond is slightly stronger than N-H· · · O=C urethane bond [16]. Conversely, it is known that the primary hydrogen bond acceptor depends on the length the soft segments and the concentration of the hard segments in a chain [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally, the N-H· · · O=C hydrogen bond between two urea groups has been considered the strongest, with hydrogen bond between two urethane groups being the second strongest. However, recent studies have shown that N-H· · · O (ether) bond is slightly stronger than N-H· · · O=C urethane bond [16]. Conversely, it is known that the primary hydrogen bond acceptor depends on the length the soft segments and the concentration of the hard segments in a chain [17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HS and SS are thermodynamically incompatible at low temperatures, resulting in the microphase separated structure of PU [14,15]. The grade of the microphase separation can be determined from IR spectra using the part of free and hydrogen bonded carbonyl groups in urethane and urea bonds [16]. The FTIR spectra of the pristine and nanofilled PU foams and are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the carbamate is severely impeding attack by MAH, most likely because of the greater rigidity of 21 than 3. The carbamate moiety is planar with a rotational barrier of around 12 kcal/mole for rotation about the O-(C=O) bond [18]. Molecular mechanics models suggest a rotation of 90 -100 o around this bond, thus costing close to the maximal energy, would be needed to adjust phenyl carbamate to the ground state phenylacetamide geometry.…”
Section: Inhibition By O-acyl Hydroxamic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All parameters are listed in Tables 1-4. Parameters for the PHR-XYR bond, XYR-PHR-XYR angle, PHR-XYR-BER angle, BER-PHR-XYR angle, BER-XYR-PHR-BER dihedral, XYR-PHR-BER-XYR dihedral, and PHR-BER-XYR-PHR dihedral are calculated according to the structural information provided by the atomistic force field PCFF [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54], since they are not available in DeVane's work. Considering the difference between the PPE polymer and its DMP monomer, we make several adjustments to other parameters in order to make the parameters suitable for PPE in this study, especially to the PHR bead, because most of the PHR beads here represent a BER bead with an ether oxygen rather than a hydroxyl oxygen.…”
Section: Scheme 1 the Cg Mapping Of A Ppe Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The polymer consistent force field (PCFF) [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] was employed throughout the atomistic simulations. The simulations employ periodic boundary condition in all directions and all PS chains in the atomistic simulations are isotactic.…”
Section: 2 Simulation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%