2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.4999445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab initio study of lattice instabilities of zinc chalcogenides ZnX (X=O, S, Se, Te) induced by ultrafast intense laser irradiation

Abstract: Nonlinear optics in germanium mid-infrared fiber material: Detuning oscillations in femtosecond mid-infrared spectroscopy AIP Advances 7, 095125 (2017);

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface properties of ZnO are critical in determining the activity of the material, and in this respect, Wander and Harrison studied ZnO (101̅0) by ab initio simulations. Ren et al also performed ab initio simulations of lattice constants and lattice stabilities of ZnX (X = O, S, Se, Te) at different electronic temperatures using the pseudopotential method of generalized gradient approximation (GGA) within the DFT. Ellmer and Bikowski restated that one of the limitations in DFT model calculations is the underestimation of the fundamental difference of the ZnO band ( E g = 3.4 eV) with calculated band gap values ranging from 0.4 to 3.77 eV …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface properties of ZnO are critical in determining the activity of the material, and in this respect, Wander and Harrison studied ZnO (101̅0) by ab initio simulations. Ren et al also performed ab initio simulations of lattice constants and lattice stabilities of ZnX (X = O, S, Se, Te) at different electronic temperatures using the pseudopotential method of generalized gradient approximation (GGA) within the DFT. Ellmer and Bikowski restated that one of the limitations in DFT model calculations is the underestimation of the fundamental difference of the ZnO band ( E g = 3.4 eV) with calculated band gap values ranging from 0.4 to 3.77 eV …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%