2016
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s99746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab interno trabeculectomy: patient selection and perspectives

Abstract: Ab interno trabeculectomy is one among several recently introduced minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries that avoid a conjunctival incision and full-thickness sclerostomy involved in traditional glaucoma surgery. Ablation of the trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm’s canal is performed in an arcuate fashion via a clear corneal incision, alone or in combination with phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Intraocular pressure reduction following ab interno trabeculectomy is limited by resistance in dista… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a previous study,[ 15 ] patients with primary or various secondary open-angle glaucomas as well as narrow angles were included, except neovascular glaucoma and those with postoperative follow-ups <3 months. All patients received either Trabectome alone or Trabectome with phacoemulsification/intraocular lens implantation.…”
Section: Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a previous study,[ 15 ] patients with primary or various secondary open-angle glaucomas as well as narrow angles were included, except neovascular glaucoma and those with postoperative follow-ups <3 months. All patients received either Trabectome alone or Trabectome with phacoemulsification/intraocular lens implantation.…”
Section: Ethodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many clinical scenarios where MIGS may be appropriate for a patient and may offer advantages over traditional glaucoma therapies. 3 Decisions on which clinical scenarios to perform MIGS will be aided by a better understanding of the relative safety and efficacy of the MIGS procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%