The SAGE Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory 2019
DOI: 10.4135/9781526436061.n15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abduction: The Logic of Discovery of Grounded Theory – An Updated Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is even more paradoxical and complex since some writers have criticized GTM, arguing that “grounded theory presumes that empirical observations are inherently sociologically relevant,” and that “[T]he emergence of theoretical codes or categories from the data is dependent on the ability to grasp empirical phenomena in theoretical terms, or, in other words, on ‘theoretical sensitivity’, a competence that demands training and background in sociological theory” (Tavory & Timmermans, 2019). While others have offered the opposite argument, agreeing with Gibson and Hartman’s (2014) observation that the lack of engagement with sociology hampers grounded theories (Reichertz, 2019, emphasis added).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The situation is even more paradoxical and complex since some writers have criticized GTM, arguing that “grounded theory presumes that empirical observations are inherently sociologically relevant,” and that “[T]he emergence of theoretical codes or categories from the data is dependent on the ability to grasp empirical phenomena in theoretical terms, or, in other words, on ‘theoretical sensitivity’, a competence that demands training and background in sociological theory” (Tavory & Timmermans, 2019). While others have offered the opposite argument, agreeing with Gibson and Hartman’s (2014) observation that the lack of engagement with sociology hampers grounded theories (Reichertz, 2019, emphasis added).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Charmaz has shared the anecdote about Strauss proclaiming to her in the late 1960s that GTM is an abductive method, something that has been articulated and widely appreciated by the German-speaking GTM community for far longer than it has been among the Anglophone community. Both The Handbook of Grounded Theory (Bryant & Charmaz, 2007b) and The Handbook of Current Developments in Grounded Theory (Bryant & Charmaz, 2019) include several chapters by key figures from the German-speaking GTM community, exemplifying this very clearly (see for instance, Flick, 2019;Kelle, 2019;Reichertz, 2007Reichertz, , 2019Strübing, 2007Strübing, , 2019. Glaser and Strauss (1967) only make brief mention of induction in their early writing, but their claim that GTM "is an inductive method of theory development" (p. 114) has been taken up and propagated by large numbers of GTM researchers ever since.…”
Section: The Gtm Mantramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There is no clear consensus of abductive reasoning or logic and quite a few philosophical, health and social researchers have tried to understand and explain this concept [185,186,[196][197][198][199][200][201][202]]. An American philosopher, Charles C. Peirce, worked out the concept of abduction; which also had some similarities with the practical and methodological priorities in grounded theory [198,199,203].…”
Section: Research Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%