2023
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ability of 18F-FDG Positron Emission Tomography Radiomics and Machine Learning in Predicting KRAS Mutation Status in Therapy-Naive Lung Adenocarcinoma

Abstract: Objective: Considering the essential role of KRAS mutation in NSCLC and the limited experience of PET radiomic features in KRAS mutation, a prediction model was built in our current analysis. Our model aims to evaluate the status of KRAS mutants in lung adenocarcinoma by combining PET radiomics and machine learning. Method: Patients were retrospectively selected from our database and screened from the NSCLC radiogenomic dataset from TCIA. The dataset was randomly divided into three subgroups. Two open-source s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…VOIs were placed on primary tumors only. There is increasing interest in assessing the role of radiomics in predicting survival or other clinical-pathological features in NSCLC [44,[51][52][53][54][55][56]. While most studies uniquely tested the role of models mixing clinical and radiomic variables, we performed a comparative study where a model containing uniquely clinical variables (tumor stage and SUVmax), referred to as the reference model, was contrasted with a model that, in addition to tumor stage and SUVmax, contained one radiomic variable (NGTDM_Coarseness, radiomic model); these variables had been automatically selected by our data selection method (LASSO procedure).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VOIs were placed on primary tumors only. There is increasing interest in assessing the role of radiomics in predicting survival or other clinical-pathological features in NSCLC [44,[51][52][53][54][55][56]. While most studies uniquely tested the role of models mixing clinical and radiomic variables, we performed a comparative study where a model containing uniquely clinical variables (tumor stage and SUVmax), referred to as the reference model, was contrasted with a model that, in addition to tumor stage and SUVmax, contained one radiomic variable (NGTDM_Coarseness, radiomic model); these variables had been automatically selected by our data selection method (LASSO procedure).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%