2016
DOI: 10.3847/0067-0049/227/2/15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ablation and Chemical Alteration of Cosmic Dust Particles During Entry Into the Earth’s Atmosphere

Abstract: Most dust-sized cosmic particles undergo ablation and chemical alteration during atmospheric entry, which alters their original properties. A comprehensive understanding of this process is essential in order to decipher their preentry characteristics. The purpose of the study is to illustrate the process of vaporization of different elements for various entry parameters. The numerical results for particles of various sizes and various zenith angles are treated in order to understand the changes in chemical com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These meteoric smoke particles are thought to play a significant role in the formation of noctilucent clouds (see, e.g., Rapp and Thomas, 2006) in the summer polar mesosphere and for aerosols and clouds in the stratosphere (see, e.g., Murphy et al, 1998;Voigt et al, 2005;Curtius et al, 2005). However, to quantify the impact of meteoric smoke on the middle atmosphere, it is important to understand the changes in chemical composition of the incoming particles during their entry into the Earth's atmosphere (e.g., Rudraswami et al, 2016) and how much meteoric material is on average deposited into the Earth's atmosphere. The rate of daily influx of meteoric material into the upper atmosphere has a large uncertainty, with estimates varying between 1 and 300 t day −1 (see, e.g., Table 1 of Plane, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These meteoric smoke particles are thought to play a significant role in the formation of noctilucent clouds (see, e.g., Rapp and Thomas, 2006) in the summer polar mesosphere and for aerosols and clouds in the stratosphere (see, e.g., Murphy et al, 1998;Voigt et al, 2005;Curtius et al, 2005). However, to quantify the impact of meteoric smoke on the middle atmosphere, it is important to understand the changes in chemical composition of the incoming particles during their entry into the Earth's atmosphere (e.g., Rudraswami et al, 2016) and how much meteoric material is on average deposited into the Earth's atmosphere. The rate of daily influx of meteoric material into the upper atmosphere has a large uncertainty, with estimates varying between 1 and 300 t day −1 (see, e.g., Table 1 of Plane, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Rudraswami et al. , , , ). This could be due to either (1) a population deprived of S‐type asteroids in the asteroid belt or (2) an underrepresentation of dust related to ordinary chondrites in Earth resonant orbits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Slightly different angles, velocities, physical properties, and chemical compositions of the incoming particles would make the transition between melted and unmelted particles (Rudraswami et al. ). The more evolved meteorites such as the high metamorphic grade ordinary chondrites find lesser representation among the micrometeorites because they have greater tensile strengths and therefore do not fragment into smaller sized pieces during asteroidal collisions (Rudraswami et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%