1979
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9394(79)90467-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormalities of Central Contrast Sensitivity in Glaucoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
49
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinically, contrast sensitivity becomes relevant for several eye diseases such as cataract [6][7][8], glaucoma [9,10], amblyopia [11,12], multiple sclerosis [13][14][15], macular degenerations [16,17], and diabetic retinopathy [18,19]. The knowledge of the smallest perceivable contrast is also essential in order to verify the success of ocular surgeries e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinically, contrast sensitivity becomes relevant for several eye diseases such as cataract [6][7][8], glaucoma [9,10], amblyopia [11,12], multiple sclerosis [13][14][15], macular degenerations [16,17], and diabetic retinopathy [18,19]. The knowledge of the smallest perceivable contrast is also essential in order to verify the success of ocular surgeries e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients had a full ophthalmic assessment which included Goldmann perimetry and VEP investigation while wearing their optimum optical correction. Of the patients investigated 29 (5 The latency of the 'P100' components was measured in all investigations. With respect to amplitude a peak-peak amplitude measure was adopted.…”
Section: Patients and Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arden & Jacobson (1978) used black and white gratings in glaucoma screening and demonstrated losses at low spatial frequencies in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. The incidence of false-positive and false-negative results was too high, however, even after improvement of the technique by others (Atkin et al 1979;Lundh 1985a). Measuring contrast sensitivity peripherally seemed to improve accuracy, but was tiI..4e-eonsuming (Lundh 1985b;FalcaoReis et al 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%