2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormality of the DNA double-strand-break checkpoint/repair genes, ATM, BRCA1 and TP53, in breast cancer is related to tumour grade

Abstract: The role of the DNA double-strand-break (DSB) checkpoint/repair genes, ATM, BRCA1 and TP53, in sporadic breast cancer requires clarification, since ATM and BRCA1 mutations are rare in sporadic tumours. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, we postulated that (i) in addition to genetic deletion, abnormal expression of DSB checkpoint/repair proteins might abolish the function of these genes and (ii) there might be a combined effect of individual defective genes during breast cancer pathogenesis. Using a larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that the familial breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in the homologous recombination pathway for DNA DSB repair (48) and our previous finding that the extent of DSB-initiated chromosomal instability in tumors increases significantly, as tumors progress to poorer grades or later stages (21) support the idea that breast cancer pathogenesis is driven by DSB-initiated chromosomal instability, and we hypothesize that the mechanisms regulating DSB repair may play a mutator role. In our recent studies (16,25,26,49), we have identified specific molecular DSB repair mechanisms, functional aberrations of which are related to an increased risk of breast cancer and advanced pathologic/clinical manifestations. The results of the present study provide additional evidence supporting the mutator role of DSB repair mechanisms during breast cancer formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that the familial breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 are involved in the homologous recombination pathway for DNA DSB repair (48) and our previous finding that the extent of DSB-initiated chromosomal instability in tumors increases significantly, as tumors progress to poorer grades or later stages (21) support the idea that breast cancer pathogenesis is driven by DSB-initiated chromosomal instability, and we hypothesize that the mechanisms regulating DSB repair may play a mutator role. In our recent studies (16,25,26,49), we have identified specific molecular DSB repair mechanisms, functional aberrations of which are related to an increased risk of breast cancer and advanced pathologic/clinical manifestations. The results of the present study provide additional evidence supporting the mutator role of DSB repair mechanisms during breast cancer formation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our case-control study is part of an ongoing cooperative study aimed at understanding the causes of breast cancer in Taiwan, which is characterized by low incidence, early tumor onset, hormone dependency, and novel genomic alterations (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Because of the low incidence of breast cancer in the Taiwanese population, which suggests an overall lower effect of common risk factors, and because of its homogenous genetic background, this population is considered to have certain advantages for studying the effects of subtle genetic variations (17,20), such as SNPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case-control study is part of an ongoing cooperative study aimed at understanding the causes of breast cancer in Taiwan, which is characterized by low incidence, early tumor onset, hormone dependency, and novel genomic alterations (28)(29)(30). We studied 940 female breast cancer women with pathologically confirmed incident primary breast cancer seen at the Tri-Service General Hospital or the Changhua Christian Hospital between March 2002 and August 2005.…”
Section: Study Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%