Abortion in Europe

Abstract

There is a high level of agreement in the EU Member States with respect to a woman's right to abortion. Poland and Malta are the only exceptions to the liberal abortion regime in Europe. Yet, this issue is still considered highly divisive. The balance between a woman's right to abortion and the foetal right to life is still the topic of numerous legal and ethical discussions, which is a result of the recent rise of populism and anti-gender movements. In Europe, interwoven by different legal orders, international, supranational and national ones, the issue of human rights is dealt with at several levels. The EU Member States have assigned some of their sovereign rights to EU level, which is not the case with the area of reproductive rights and hence the issue of abortion is still firmly bound to state sovereignty. This is not the first paper that deals with this issue, so the third part of the paper investigates the relevant legal literature. What is challenged is the prevalent standpoint that the level of the protection of a woman's right to abortion is fairly low if judging by the case-law of the above courts since neither court has regarded a woman's right to abortion as a fundamental human right. The authors try to find an answer to the question whether abortion restrictions are contrary to the fundamental principle of gender equality.

Apoteoza Socijalne Države: Imperativni Zahtjev Ostvarenja Socijalne Pravde U Republici Hrvatskoj

“…112 Tucak i Blagojević zaključuju kako URH sadrži izdašan katalog socijalnih prava, a brojno i promjenjivo zakonodavstvo u okolnostima ekonomske krize podliježe značajnoj redukciji socijalnih prava, pri čemu je USRH naklonjen takvim legislativnim rješenjima. 113 Analizirajući iznesenu tvrdnju valja uzeti u obzir recentniju praksu, ponajprije Rješenje o ocjeni ustavnosti tzv. zakona o konverziji kredita u švicarskim francima 114 (u nastavku: zakoni o konverziji) u kojem USRH ponavlja predanost hrvatskog Ustava socijalnoj državi i socijalnoj pravdi, ali i ističe potrebu odmjeravanja potencijalno suprotstavljenih ustavnih vrijednosti: vlasničkih prava, poduzetničkih i tržišnih sloboda te zahtjeva proizišlih iz ideje države blagostanja.…”

Evolución en las opiniones de las élites parlamentarias sobre aborto y matrimonio homosexual: Ecuador y Uruguay 2000-2020

“…States prescribe conditions under which abortion can be performed legally, the deadline for its performance (generally in early stages of pregnancy) and similar. Likewise, it can be said that foetus has the "right to life" in the strict sense of the term right only if the women has a correlative duty to complete pregnancy (Tucak & Blagojević, 2020, pág. 1138.…”