IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems Design and Implementation, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/sips.2005.1579839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

About carries and tokens: re-using adder circuits for arbitration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preußer et al described the analogies among the carry propagation of addition and token-based arbitration to derive an optimized mapping of arbiter circuits by a manual low-level implementation [4]. This group later presents a generalized approach, which enables the highlevel and portable description of carry-chain computations by the standard addition operator [5].…”
Section: A Generalized Carry-chain Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preußer et al described the analogies among the carry propagation of addition and token-based arbitration to derive an optimized mapping of arbiter circuits by a manual low-level implementation [4]. This group later presents a generalized approach, which enables the highlevel and portable description of carry-chain computations by the standard addition operator [5].…”
Section: A Generalized Carry-chain Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular use case (without intermediate prefix results) is even enjoying some but no consistent support by a few of the latest synthesis tools. Another use was demonstrated for token-based arbitration schemes [7], which, however, require a device-specific, low-level design to achieve such a mapping. An automated mapping of deep logic chains to carry chains was described by Frederick and Somani [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%