2015
DOI: 10.1097/pas.0000000000000415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abrupt Loss of MLH1 and PMS2 Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma

Abstract: Given that endometrial cancer (EC) is often the sentinel cancer for female Lynch syndrome patients, we have successfully implemented universal screening of ECs and have previously shown that this is the preferred method to identify these patients. However, during the course of universal screening of EC, we encountered 6 cases with an unusual pattern of mismatch-repair protein immunohistochemistry that has not been previously described in this setting. In these 6 cases, there was an abrupt loss of MLH1 and PMS2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
42
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Furthermore, LS screening studies in gastrointestinal pathology suggest that colonic adenomas (precursor lesions for colonic adenocarcinoma) should not be screened routinely for LS, largely because the exact timing of somatic MMR mutations, and hence the acquisition of an MMR phenotype, in colorectal tumorigenesis is still controversial. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Unlike Pai et al, 22 we failed to find convincing evidence of histomorphologic differences across MMR-intact and MMR-deficient subclones, with 1 exception. A single case of mixed endometrioid grade 3 and serous carcinoma demonstrated subclonal loss of MLH1/PMS2 in the endometrioid component only.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Furthermore, LS screening studies in gastrointestinal pathology suggest that colonic adenomas (precursor lesions for colonic adenocarcinoma) should not be screened routinely for LS, largely because the exact timing of somatic MMR mutations, and hence the acquisition of an MMR phenotype, in colorectal tumorigenesis is still controversial. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Unlike Pai et al, 22 we failed to find convincing evidence of histomorphologic differences across MMR-intact and MMR-deficient subclones, with 1 exception. A single case of mixed endometrioid grade 3 and serous carcinoma demonstrated subclonal loss of MLH1/PMS2 in the endometrioid component only.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Presumably, gains in methylation occur over time, ultimately resulting in complete silencing of MLH1. 22,31 Alternatively, subclonal loss of MLH1/PMS2 in the setting of MLH1 promoter methylation may result from a "second hit" (ie, somatic mutation) leading to a resultant loss of expression by IHC. 32 From a clinical perspective, identification of heterogenous MLH1/PMS2 loss is supportive of a sporadic deficiency rather than a germline mutation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intratumoral heterogeneity of MMR status has been described in some cases of colorectal and endometrial cancer but has so far not been analyzed in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. [26][27][28][29][30] To learn more on MSI heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer, a cohort of 597 operated pancreatic cancers was screened by IHC for loss of the MMR proteins MLH1, PMS2, MSH2, and/or MSH6 on a tissue microarray (TMA). Cases with suspected MSI were further analyzed by PCR and repeated IHC on large sections followed by a thorough analysis of all available cancer-containing tissue blocks for possible intratumoral heterogeneity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Although the majority of the indeterminate staining has been described in CRC, it has also been well documented in EC with more heterogeneity in the staining pattern, and subclonal loss as being the most frequent finding. [28][29][30][31] Indeterminate MMR staining in not unexpected because some gene mutations can be associated with intact protein expression, albeit a dysfunctional one, that can be detected by routine IHC. 8,32 Nontruncating point mutations or mutations in the noncoding region can also result in loss of enzymatic function with preservation of the defective protein that can cause weak staining.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%