“…Summarizing the discussion above, we would like to point out that only the models of chirality amplification based on DNLEs, i.e., on asymmetric autocatalysis and asymmetric autoamplification/dynamic chirality control [ 33 , 34 , 42 , 47 ], stand close to the expected conditions for mimicking natural selection in chemical systems [ 55 ]. The DNLE-based models, dealing with far-from-equilibrium chemical systems, operate by analogy with competition-based biological processes (which are fundamentally irreversible) [ 48 , 55 , 56 ], while the models exploiting crystallization-assisted chiral amplification [ 53 , 54 ] or “hyperpositive” nonlinear effects [ 49 ] lack this similarity. From the mathematical perspective, the former chemical systems obey the rules similar to those of natural selection [ 48 , 56 ], which allows one entity (enantiomer), competing for the same chemical stuff, to drive the other competitor out completely and dominate the available space.…”