2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculation and Design of a Subnanomolar Inhibitor of Phosphodiesterase-10

Abstract: Accurate prediction of absolute protein−ligand binding free energy could considerably enhance the success rate of structure-based drug design but is extremely challenging and time-consuming. Free energy perturbation (FEP) has been proven reliable but is limited to prediction of relative binding free energies of similar ligands (with only minor structural differences) in binding with a same drug target in practical drug design applications. Herein, a Gaussian algorithm-enhanced FEP (GA-FEP) protocol has been de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
85
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MD simulations trajectories of complex system were used to determined relative change in binding free energy according to the MM-GBSA method [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. In order to calculate binding free energies like for CMPD178-nsP3 of CHIKV, nsP3 of CHIKV and CMPD178 was calculated for high accuracy results [ 23 , 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD simulations trajectories of complex system were used to determined relative change in binding free energy according to the MM-GBSA method [ 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ]. In order to calculate binding free energies like for CMPD178-nsP3 of CHIKV, nsP3 of CHIKV and CMPD178 was calculated for high accuracy results [ 23 , 57 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the binding pattern and calculate the binding free energy between DIP and Mpro, DIP was firstly docked onto Mpro by using Glide-SP method with the default parameters 47 , and the optimal binding pose ( Fig. S1) was further assessed by absolute binding free energy calculation with free energy perturbation 48 . The calculations were carried out in Gromacs 2019 49 , and the thermodynamic cycle and procedure was similar to that used by Matteo et al 50 .…”
Section: Free Energy Perturbation Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the virtual screening to identify new hits or leads, it is necessary to predict absolute binding free energy (ABFE) for each ligand binding with the target without the requirement to use any reference ligand structure. The FEP-ABFE approach has the advantage of predicting binding affinities between ligands and their targets more accurately than conventional computational methods, such as pharmacophore, molecule docking, and molecular simulations (29)(30)(31). However, the previously used FEP-ABFE calculations are extremely expensive and time consuming and, thus, not suitable for virtual screening purposes (that required to screen a large number of compounds) (32,33).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%