1976
DOI: 10.1088/0022-3700/9/2/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute differential cross sections for elastic scattering of electrons by helium, neon, argon and molecular nitrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
96
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
14
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental validation of these approaches is usually the comparison with the absolute measurement of the elastic peak intensity as a function of scattering angle as was done for noble gases, see e.g. [8,9]. The calculated cross sections with and without absorption are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental validation of these approaches is usually the comparison with the absolute measurement of the elastic peak intensity as a function of scattering angle as was done for noble gases, see e.g. [8,9]. The calculated cross sections with and without absorption are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TCS results are compared with the theoretical results calculated using the EBS method (Byron and Joachain [9]) and the optical potential model (OM) (Byron and Joachain [10]), and with the experimental results of Dalba et al [11], Blaauw et al [12], and Kauppila et al [13]. Detailed comparisons of the present DCS values with the theoretical results calculated using the EBS and OM theories and experimental results of Bromberg [14], Sethuraman et al [15] and Jansen et al [16] for the energies 200 and 500 eV are shown in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. The present TCS values are smaller than those obtained from the EBS and OM methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…To our knowledge, only elastic data are available from experiment [13]. Therefore, we are not able to evaluate a priori the overall angular resolution error of our measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we are not able to evaluate a priori the overall angular resolution error of our measurements. To the first approximation, the Born formula predicts the differential cross section constant in angle (at near-to-zero angles) and energy (see [8,13]). For these reasons, we can roughly assume that the angular resolution error rises linearly with energy and with the angular acceptance of the detector.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%