1975
DOI: 10.1086/153818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute f-values for resonance lines of neutral titanium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
5

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
17
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Grevesse et al (1989) earlier produced accurate g f values by renormalising the relative oscillator strengths of Blackwell et al (1982aBlackwell et al ( ,b, 1983Blackwell et al ( , 1986c, which had been obtained by absorption spectroscopy in the Oxford furnace. As opposed to the original Oxford works, in which relative oscillator strengths were set to an absolute scale using less accurate beam-foil lifetimes from Roberts et al (1973) and the absolute data of Bell et al (1975), Grevesse et al (1989) set their new values to an absolute scale using the accurate TRLIF lifetimes of Rudolph & Helbig (1982).…”
Section: Titaniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grevesse et al (1989) earlier produced accurate g f values by renormalising the relative oscillator strengths of Blackwell et al (1982aBlackwell et al ( ,b, 1983Blackwell et al ( , 1986c, which had been obtained by absorption spectroscopy in the Oxford furnace. As opposed to the original Oxford works, in which relative oscillator strengths were set to an absolute scale using less accurate beam-foil lifetimes from Roberts et al (1973) and the absolute data of Bell et al (1975), Grevesse et al (1989) set their new values to an absolute scale using the accurate TRLIF lifetimes of Rudolph & Helbig (1982).…”
Section: Titaniummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, the use of optical data to model the stellar parts of Malin 1 is limited. The expected stellar M/L ratio in the optical has a very large scatter (e.g., Bell & de Jong 2001;Bell et al 2003), and ideally we would prefer to have near-infrared images of Malin 1, which would provide a more accurate stellar M/L ratio.…”
Section: Modeling the Dark Matter Halomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As input for the K-band mass-to-light ratio of the stellar populations we have adopted M K,⊙ =3.33 (Worthey 1994). It should be noticed that along with the errors in the stellar mass-to-light ratios derived here the misunderstanding of the actual IMF introduce an additional, systematic uncertainty, which, in fact, constitutes the most important source of error in the determination of the galaxy stellar mass (Bell & de Jong 2001). In addition, the poor constraints on the theoretical isochrones of upper-RGB stars and AGB stars can result in a 20 per cent uncertainty in the K-band mass-to-light ratio (Charlot et al 1996).…”
Section: Stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the relative uncertainties, assuming the average absolute uncertainties given in Table 3 for ∆C n =0.07 mag, would be about 30 and 20 per cent, respectively for the nearby and intermediate-redshift galaxies. Although this still implies a significant improvement in the K-band mass-to-light ratio determination, it is also noticeable that the K filter now traces the restframe J-band luminosity, which is more affected by the misunderstanding about the actual IMF (see Bell & de Jong 2001). Finally, the J-band luminosity is also more sensitive to small differences between the assumed exponential star formation and the galaxy actual star formation history than the rest-frame K-band data.…”
Section: Stellar Massmentioning
confidence: 99%