2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute magnitudes of asteroids and a revision of asteroid albedo estimates from WISE thermal observations

Petr Pravec,
Alan W. Harris,
Peter Kušnirák
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
185
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
27
185
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The absolute magnitude reported by Pravec et al (2012) is H = 14.270, which is close to the value derived from the lightcurve observations, H = 14.10. Very different values are reported for the albedo: based on the WISE thermal observations, Pravec et al (2012) There are several spectra available for this object.…”
Section: (5143) Heraclessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The absolute magnitude reported by Pravec et al (2012) is H = 14.270, which is close to the value derived from the lightcurve observations, H = 14.10. Very different values are reported for the albedo: based on the WISE thermal observations, Pravec et al (2012) There are several spectra available for this object.…”
Section: (5143) Heraclessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…We used the H-G 12 values computed by Oszkiewicz et al (2011), from now on referred to as O11. Vereš et al (2015) (V15) also produced a catalogue of H-G 12 values based on Pan-STARRS photometry and found systematic differences with respect to the Minor Planet Center and O11 absolute magnitudes but not with respect to those obtained by Pravec et al (2012) based only on high-quality photometry. However, O11 and V15 have different strengths (see the discussion in V15), and a considerable fraction of objects in our catalogue are not included in the V15 catalogue.…”
Section: Thermal Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also assigned an uncertainty of 0.25 to these values. This is the observed scatter of MPC H values in this size range (see Table 3 of Pravec et al 2012).…”
Section: Debiased Datura-family Populationmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…First, we note that our accurate H for brighter Datura objects are systematically larger than the magnitude values reported by Minor Planet Center (MPC) by 0.34 ± 0.05. This is a well understood mismatch discussed by Pravec et al (2012). We assumed this correction applies also for fainter Datura members.…”
Section: Debiased Datura-family Populationmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation