1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.54.2146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute partial cross sections for electron-impact ionization ofH2,N2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

23
154
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
23
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 5 shows this comparison for non-dissociative ionization. The present cross section (continuous line) is in very good agreement with the experimental data [36,37,38,39]. The only theoretical data set available [19] is based on the Gryzinski theory combined with the Franck-Condon theory and perfectly reproduces the present data.…”
Section: Ionization Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Figure 5 shows this comparison for non-dissociative ionization. The present cross section (continuous line) is in very good agreement with the experimental data [36,37,38,39]. The only theoretical data set available [19] is based on the Gryzinski theory combined with the Franck-Condon theory and perfectly reproduces the present data.…”
Section: Ionization Cross Sectionssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These values are basically of the same order as the ones estimated, both experimentally and theoretically, for the usual processes mentioned above. 13,14 They are only a factor of three smaller then the values for ionization at these two energies. 14 The first distinguishable aspect to be noted is the energy dependence presented by equation 19.…”
Section: Numerical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…13,14 They are only a factor of three smaller then the values for ionization at these two energies. 14 The first distinguishable aspect to be noted is the energy dependence presented by equation 19. In contrast to the cases of inter-band, ionization and dissociation processes, the CBOP differential cross section presents no maximum; it increases with increasing incident energy and goes asymptotically to a value around 0.07 (in units of πa 2 0 ), as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Numerical Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking into account that the EUV photon energy, in this case, is equal to 112 eV, corresponding to maximum intensity of the EUV spectrum [9], the energy of subsequently released photoelectron is close to 100 eV, thus is sufficiently high for further ionization or excitation. This value corresponds to a maximum cross section for electron impact ionization of molecular nitrogen σ (N + 2 , N + + N 2+ 2 ), which in this case, reaches value of σ = 2.5 × 10 −16 cm 2 [12]. Taking into account the lowest gas density, used in the experiment, it results in a mean free path of photoelectrons equal to ∼0.4 mm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%