2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption kinetics and hydride formation in magnesium films: Effect of driving force revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
55
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
11
55
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also observed at a different illumination frequency. Figure S10 shows that, in both cases, the unhydrogenated material is left, which is, on first sight, unexpected from literature for Mg (21), but has also been found in hydrogenated niobium films (58). However, we explain this behavior, on the one hand, again with the formation of the blocking layer, which halts the vertical hydrogen front progression (59), leaving areas at the surface in the pristine state (see fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is also observed at a different illumination frequency. Figure S10 shows that, in both cases, the unhydrogenated material is left, which is, on first sight, unexpected from literature for Mg (21), but has also been found in hydrogenated niobium films (58). However, we explain this behavior, on the one hand, again with the formation of the blocking layer, which halts the vertical hydrogen front progression (59), leaving areas at the surface in the pristine state (see fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As mentioned above, we observe substantial amounts of pristine metallic Mg on the surface of our films, even after 60 min of hydrogenation. Comparing our results to literature findings, this behavior appears unexpected as the film is expected to have fully hydrogenated after saturation (21). This apparent contradiction can be explained when closely examining the changing film morphology and particularly the film expansion.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…These growth rate change was same in MgH 2 (int). These results be attributed to extremely low diffusion rate of H in MgH 2 when compared to that in Mg [12,13]. When the whole surface was covered with MgH 2 (sur), the supply rate of H to unreacted internal metallic Mg or AZ significantly decreased, halting the growth of MgH 2 (sur) and MgH 2 (int).…”
Section: Relationships Between Particle Size Of Mgh 2 (Int) and Al Comentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mg is a metal and when it reacts with H 2 , MgH 2 forms an ionic bond and a weak covalent bond between Mg-H and the valence number of the ion is indicated as Mg 1.91+ and H 0.26− [11]. The diffusion coefficient of H in MgH 2 is several order of magnitude lower when compared to that in Mg: D H Mg = 7 × 10 −11 m 2 s −1 (300 K) in Mg and D H MgH2 = 1.1 × 10 −20 m 2 s −1 (305 K) in MgH 2 [12,13]. Based on these characteristics, powder Mg forms core-shell-type structure hydride, MgH 2 as a shell and unreacted Mg remains in the core [14,15] making progress of completely hydrogenation difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anisotropy causes a switchover of the energies of tetrahedral and octahedral interstitial sites. Magnesium−hydrogen thin films have been studied targeting the elastic destabilization of the thermodynamically very stable Mg−hydride phase as well as its nucleation and growth dynamics . For yttrium−hydrogen thin films the metal‐to‐semi‐conductor transition upon H absorption was investigated .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%