2018
DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2018-3253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract 3253: Droplet digital PCR is a sensitive method for detecting refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) clones in peripheral blood and saliva

Abstract: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a highly sensitive and rapid method for detecting mutant allele frequency (MAF). In preliminary work, our lower limit of detection for common myeloid gene mutations was 0.001% in peripheral blood and bone marrow compared to 0.1% with flow cytometry and 0.01% with real-time quantitative PCR, and turnaround time is 1 day. Furthermore, we detected leukemic mutant alleles in peripheral blood (PB), introducing the possibility of sparing painful bone marrow biopsy procedures to determi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple groups are exploring personalized digital droplet PCR assays for MRD tracking to leverage this finding. [20][21][22] However, SCS offers the opportunity to avoid needing a personalized approach, while also allowing for identification of de novo or previously undetectable somatic variants. SCS also provides direct quantification of clonal diversity, and modeling clonal evolution may be relevant for understanding AML outcomes (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple groups are exploring personalized digital droplet PCR assays for MRD tracking to leverage this finding. [20][21][22] However, SCS offers the opportunity to avoid needing a personalized approach, while also allowing for identification of de novo or previously undetectable somatic variants. SCS also provides direct quantification of clonal diversity, and modeling clonal evolution may be relevant for understanding AML outcomes (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%