2016
DOI: 10.1049/el.2016.1138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstraction techniques to improve scalability of equivalence verification for NCL circuits

Abstract: Asynchronous NULL convention logic (NCL) circuits are dual-rail quasi-delay-insensitive circuits that have many applications in high radiation and extreme temperature fluctuation environments such as space exploration. Two abstraction techniques are proposed that can be used to drastically improve the efficiency and scalability of formal equivalence verification targeted at NCL circuits. The effectiveness of the abstraction techniques have been demonstrated using a number of multiply and accumulate circuit ben… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the synthesized NCL structures differ significantly from their synchronous specifications. A few formal verification methods have also been developed to verify the safety (functional correctness) and liveness (deadlock-free operation) of the synthesized NCL circuits [13][14][15]. However, these formal methods are only applicable to conventional NCL architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the synthesized NCL structures differ significantly from their synchronous specifications. A few formal verification methods have also been developed to verify the safety (functional correctness) and liveness (deadlock-free operation) of the synthesized NCL circuits [13][14][15]. However, these formal methods are only applicable to conventional NCL architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have also been several formal verification approaches to check safety and liveness of NCL circuits [8,9]; however, safety and liveness verification does not guarantee input completeness, which has to be verified independently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%